diff options
author | 2024-04-16 05:52:34 +0100 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2024-04-16 05:52:34 +0100 | |
commit | deec424371a2b6e4d5a71a60be43ef724bacf4c2 (patch) | |
tree | dad51ecfa35aae1b2b501a77c58166b3d3c92a3d | |
parent | meeting-logs: add 20240310 (diff) | |
download | council-deec424371a2b6e4d5a71a60be43ef724bacf4c2.tar.gz council-deec424371a2b6e4d5a71a60be43ef724bacf4c2.tar.bz2 council-deec424371a2b6e4d5a71a60be43ef724bacf4c2.zip |
meeting-logs: add 20240414
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
-rw-r--r-- | meeting-logs/20240414.txt | 261 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meeting-logs/20240414.txt.asc | 9 |
2 files changed, 270 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meeting-logs/20240414.txt b/meeting-logs/20240414.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..45f6e94 --- /dev/null +++ b/meeting-logs/20240414.txt @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ +[2024-04-14T20:00:01+0100] <@sam_> !proj council +[2024-04-14T20:00:02+0100] <willikins> sam_: (council@gentoo.org) ajak, dilfridge, mattst88, mgorny, sam, soap, ulm +[2024-04-14T20:00:05+0100] <@sam_> hello! +[2024-04-14T20:00:09+0100] <@sam_> Agenda: https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-project&m=171259225430396&w=2 +[2024-04-14T20:00:16+0100] <@sam_> arthurzam: ^ +[2024-04-14T20:00:23+0100] <@sam_> 1. Roll call +[2024-04-14T20:00:24+0100] • sam_: here +[2024-04-14T20:00:25+0100] • arthurzam: here (proxy for mattst88) +[2024-04-14T20:00:35+0100] • mgorny: here +[2024-04-14T20:00:50+0100] • ulm: here +[2024-04-14T20:02:58+0100] <@sam_> ajak: soap: dilfridge: wakies +[2024-04-14T20:03:14+0100] <@sam_> we'll wait 5 minutes +[2024-04-14T20:03:14+0100] <+arthurzam> dilfridge|mobile: maybe this ping? +[2024-04-14T20:03:18+0100] <@sam_> ah, good point +[2024-04-14T20:03:31+0100] • soap: here +[2024-04-14T20:03:33+0100] <+arthurzam> (and if yes, please renick for logs) +[2024-04-14T20:03:44+0100] <@ulm> we have a quorum :) +[2024-04-14T20:08:04+0100] <@sam_> ok +[2024-04-14T20:08:07+0100] <@sam_> let's crack on +[2024-04-14T20:08:26+0100] <@sam_> +[2024-04-14T20:08:27+0100] <@sam_> 2. Foundation dissolution status update +[2024-04-14T20:08:43+0100] <@sam_> I included this given I think we ought to every meeting unless we have a reason not to +[2024-04-14T20:08:59+0100] <@sam_> We have a development, I think, as the SPI meeting took place after our last meeting +[2024-04-14T20:09:01+0100] <@sam_> ulm: +[2024-04-14T20:09:20+0100] <@ulm> a news item about SPI (by dilfridge, robbat2 and me) is on our front page +[2024-04-14T20:09:37+0100] <+arthurzam> https://www.gentoo.org/news/2024/04/10/SPI-associated-project.html +[2024-04-14T20:09:53+0100] • ajak: here +[2024-04-14T20:10:03+0100] <@ajak> (sorry) +[2024-04-14T20:10:09+0100] <@sam_> right, we had a formal invitation in https://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/2024/2024-03-11.js.1/ +[2024-04-14T20:10:14+0100] <@sam_> we then accepted it +[2024-04-14T20:10:20+0100] <@sam_> what is next? +[2024-04-14T20:10:21+0100] <@ulm> might be useful to have a trustees meeting in the near future to define the roadmap +[2024-04-14T20:11:06+0100] <@ulm> we also have a porject page there: https://www.spi-inc.org/projects/gentoo/ +[2024-04-14T20:11:12+0100] <@ulm> with a donate link +[2024-04-14T20:11:44+0100] <@sam_> I think that's about it for us - other than encouraging the trustees meeting to happen soon +[2024-04-14T20:11:46+0100] <@sam_> right? +[2024-04-14T20:12:05+0100] <@ulm> yeah, no other news +[2024-04-14T20:12:10+0100] <@sam_> ok, wfm :) +[2024-04-14T20:12:18+0100] <@sam_> +[2024-04-14T20:12:19+0100] <@ulm> obviously some details must still be worked out +[2024-04-14T20:12:25+0100] <@sam_> yeah +[2024-04-14T20:12:28+0100] <@sam_> 3. Concerns about (lack of redundancy) in PR project [1] +[2024-04-14T20:12:31+0100] <@sam_> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/925014 +[2024-04-14T20:12:32+0100] <@sam_> mgorny: +[2024-04-14T20:13:15+0100] <@mgorny> well, i don't think they've replied to anyone at all, did they? +[2024-04-14T20:13:27+0100] <@sam_> nope +[2024-04-14T20:13:29+0100] <+arthurzam> Me (and also mattst88) also think that infra secrets is a good place to store them. Do we know who controls those accounts? +[2024-04-14T20:13:41+0100] <@sam_> ajak lists some in the bug and I think that's roughly right +[2024-04-14T20:13:48+0100] <@mgorny> supposedly people listed in the project page +[2024-04-14T20:13:48+0100] <@sam_> we should definitely have them in the infra secrets repo as a fallback +[2024-04-14T20:14:08+0100] <@ajak> should infra have peoples' personal creds? or an infra account should be added to the services? or what? +[2024-04-14T20:14:08+0100] <@sam_> I explicitly CC'd maffblaster, rich0, alicef now but they are presumably on the assignee alias anyway (pr@) +[2024-04-14T20:14:24+0100] <@sam_> for mastodon, it's a shared account +[2024-04-14T20:14:31+0100] <@mgorny> what sam_ said +[2024-04-14T20:14:33+0100] <@sam_> for reddit, I guess we should have an official gentoo one which is an admin, which nobody uses +[2024-04-14T20:14:44+0100] <+arthurzam> ajak: we should use the secrets repo as only fallback in case lost creds or contact +[2024-04-14T20:15:00+0100] <@ajak> yes, but creds should be in secrets.git for what account? +[2024-04-14T20:15:05+0100] <@mgorny> no harm in having two rules +[2024-04-14T20:15:08+0100] <@mgorny> something like: +[2024-04-14T20:15:16+0100] <@mgorny> 1) if we have dedicated acct, shared creds in infra-secrets +[2024-04-14T20:15:30+0100] <@mgorny> 2) if we need to go through personal accts, at least 2 people +[2024-04-14T20:15:57+0100] <@ajak> works for me, but then we need cooperation of the people controlling those with n<2 +[2024-04-14T20:15:58+0100] <@sam_> maybe also: 3) consider having a dummy 'gentooadmin' account or something with permissions which is in infra-secrets +[2024-04-14T20:16:19+0100] <+arthurzam> Hmm, (3) is a good point, a way to recover in disaster +[2024-04-14T20:17:08+0100] <@mgorny> 2 active people, even +[2024-04-14T20:17:24+0100] <@ajak> yeah, good idea +[2024-04-14T20:17:26+0100] <+arthurzam> alicef can be contacted (spoke with her not long ago in IRC), so I think can be done +[2024-04-14T20:17:32+0100] <@sam_> i'm disappointed we had no response from pr@ at all other than dilfridge offering access to the FB +[2024-04-14T20:17:32+0100] <@mgorny> i.e. we probably need to replace all admins right now +[2024-04-14T20:17:49+0100] <+arthurzam> Maybe lost in mailbox +[2024-04-14T20:17:59+0100] <@ajak> arthurzam: i did ping them in -pr +[2024-04-14T20:18:07+0100] <+arthurzam> Oh, I see. +[2024-04-14T20:18:23+0100] <@mgorny> not sure if we ought to issue a call for new members immediately, or set ground rules first and give PR team chance to handle that +[2024-04-14T20:18:38+0100] <@ajak> (and such a responsiveness problem isn't unique to this particular instance aiui) +[2024-04-14T20:18:51+0100] <+arthurzam> I think rules before, and then handle with them to match rules +[2024-04-14T20:19:00+0100] <+arthurzam> I think the suggestions here is very logical and normal +[2024-04-14T20:19:31+0100] <@ajak> how do we get their attention to do anything about it? +[2024-04-14T20:19:53+0100] <+arthurzam> block git push to ::gentoo +[2024-04-14T20:19:53+0100] • arthurzam: hides +[2024-04-14T20:20:16+0100] <@mgorny> set a deadline and immediate retirement if they don't meet it xP +[2024-04-14T20:21:09+0100] <@sam_> it's hard because I'm not really sure what we could/should do here +[2024-04-14T20:21:12+0100] <@sam_> but it's also a real problem +[2024-04-14T20:21:33+0100] • ajak: nods +[2024-04-14T20:21:33+0100] <@sam_> I guess we email pr@ and cc all members explicitly and tell them the suggestion is not acceptable +[2024-04-14T20:21:37+0100] <@mgorny> it's really a problem that the PR team should address itself +[2024-04-14T20:21:39+0100] <@mgorny> but see above +[2024-04-14T20:21:39+0100] <@sam_> the lack of reachability and lack of redundancy +[2024-04-14T20:21:46+0100] <@sam_> s/suggestion/situation/ +[2024-04-14T20:22:06+0100] <@mgorny> another option is to disband PR team from above +[2024-04-14T20:22:09+0100] <@mgorny> but that also sucks +[2024-04-14T20:22:46+0100] <@ajak> not exactly the best way to ensure we get shared access to all the things, either +[2024-04-14T20:23:03+0100] <@sam_> this is the issue, we need something from them +[2024-04-14T20:23:07+0100] <@sam_> which fundamentally requires them to.. do something +[2024-04-14T20:23:13+0100] <+arthurzam> Maybe setup the playground rules and policy, and then give them appropriate time to initiate contact, and handle the process +[2024-04-14T20:23:13+0100] <+arthurzam> Some of the accounts aren't personal, so should be simple to handle +[2024-04-14T20:23:38+0100] <+arthurzam> Perform personal pings - should work +[2024-04-14T20:23:42+0100] <@mgorny> well, we managed games team in the past +[2024-04-14T20:23:49+0100] <@mgorny> we can manage PR +[2024-04-14T20:23:59+0100] <@sam_> my suggestion is we write to gentoo-project@ about it and also do: +[2024-04-14T20:24:00+0100] <@sam_> [20:21:33] <@sam_> I guess we email pr@ and cc all members explicitly and tell them the suggestion is not acceptable +[2024-04-14T20:24:02+0100] <@sam_> and then go from there +[2024-04-14T20:24:12+0100] <@sam_> s/suggestion/situation/ :) +[2024-04-14T20:24:16+0100] <@ajak> how about: email them explicitly, ping them on irc, just notify by any means, see if that gets us anywhere by next meeting? +[2024-04-14T20:24:20+0100] <@sam_> right +[2024-04-14T20:24:29+0100] <+arthurzam> ajak++ +[2024-04-14T20:24:51+0100] <@ajak> i'm not sure publicly thrashing them is best, maybe -core? (surely that's higher visibility due to lower traffic than -project/-dev?) +[2024-04-14T20:24:57+0100] <@mgorny> let's draft that -project mail later and review before sending +[2024-04-14T20:25:02+0100] <@sam_> wfm +[2024-04-14T20:25:08+0100] <@mgorny> s/-project/-core/ +[2024-04-14T20:25:21+0100] <@sam_> (on both counts) +[2024-04-14T20:25:21+0100] • ajak: yes +[2024-04-14T20:25:38+0100] <@sam_> I was about to ask if anyone objects +[2024-04-14T20:25:42+0100] <@sam_> I guess a vote works if needed +[2024-04-14T20:26:30+0100] <@sam_> let's crack on +[2024-04-14T20:26:35+0100] <@mgorny> just to be clear, we're talking about a mail requesting better redundancy, with specific suggestions from the conversation above? +[2024-04-14T20:26:36+0100] <@sam_> I think it's fine and not objectionable +[2024-04-14T20:26:37+0100] <@sam_> yes +[2024-04-14T20:26:46+0100] <+arthurzam> yes +[2024-04-14T20:26:51+0100] • mgorny: yes +[2024-04-14T20:26:55+0100] • sam_: yes :D +[2024-04-14T20:27:11+0100] <@sam_> soap, ulm: +[2024-04-14T20:27:39+0100] • ulm: yes (though not sure why we would need a vote) +[2024-04-14T20:27:47+0100] <@sam_> nor me but people started voting :) +[2024-04-14T20:27:56+0100] <@sam_> I was just agreeing +[2024-04-14T20:28:02+0100] <@ajak> .. me too +[2024-04-14T20:28:14+0100] <@sam_> ok whatever +[2024-04-14T20:28:24+0100] <@ajak> i am not sure that was a real vote but we have a majority anyway +[2024-04-14T20:28:25+0100] <@sam_> let's call it acclamation +[2024-04-14T20:28:26+0100] <@sam_> yes +[2024-04-14T20:28:33+0100] <@sam_> it's not like this is remotely controversial anyway +[2024-04-14T20:28:34+0100] <@sam_> SO +[2024-04-14T20:28:38+0100] <@sam_> that's the next topic.. +[2024-04-14T20:28:38+0100] <@sam_> +[2024-04-14T20:28:39+0100] <@sam_> 4. Policy on AI contributions and tooling [2][3][4] +[2024-04-14T20:28:46+0100] <@sam_> [2] https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=170904501611467&w=2 +[2024-04-14T20:28:46+0100] <@sam_> [3] https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-project&m=171194365632070&w=2 +[2024-04-14T20:28:46+0100] <@sam_> [4] https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=171103460625707&w=2 +[2024-04-14T20:28:48+0100] <@sam_> mgorny: +[2024-04-14T20:28:50+0100] <@sam_> oh and arthurzam: +[2024-04-14T20:28:54+0100] • soap: yes +[2024-04-14T20:29:31+0100] <+arthurzam> I think we can just vote on the motion, just need to repeat it for logs? +[2024-04-14T20:29:38+0100] <@sam_> sure +[2024-04-14T20:29:50+0100] <@sam_> in [4], mgorny proposed this: +[2024-04-14T20:29:53+0100] <@mgorny> yeah, let's go straight to vote if nobody has any questions +[2024-04-14T20:29:59+0100] <@sam_> """ +[2024-04-14T20:29:59+0100] <@sam_> It is expressly forbidden to contribute to Gentoo any content that has +[2024-04-14T20:29:59+0100] <@sam_> been created with the assistance of Natural Language Processing +[2024-04-14T20:29:59+0100] <@sam_> artificial intelligence tools. This motion can be revisited, should +[2024-04-14T20:29:59+0100] <@sam_> a case been made over such a tool that does not pose copyright, ethical +[2024-04-14T20:29:59+0100] <@sam_> and quality concerns. +[2024-04-14T20:29:59+0100] <@sam_> """ +[2024-04-14T20:30:11+0100] <@ajak> i think it sort of goes without saying that the motion can be revisited but i won't 'no' it on that basis +[2024-04-14T20:30:30+0100] <@sam_> for mail also has, for the benefit of the log: +[2024-04-14T20:30:31+0100] <@sam_> This explicitly covers all GPTs, including ChatGPT and Copilot, which is +[2024-04-14T20:30:31+0100] <@sam_> the category causing the most concern at the moment. At the same time, +[2024-04-14T20:30:31+0100] <@sam_> it doesn't block more specific uses of machine learning to problem +[2024-04-14T20:30:31+0100] <@sam_> solving. +[2024-04-14T20:30:33+0100] <@sam_> +[2024-04-14T20:30:40+0100] <@sam_> any questions before voting? +[2024-04-14T20:31:12+0100] <@soap> nope +[2024-04-14T20:31:16+0100] <@sam_> ok +[2024-04-14T20:31:19+0100] <@sam_> let's vote then +[2024-04-14T20:31:20+0100] • sam_: yes +[2024-04-14T20:31:23+0100] • mgorny: yes +[2024-04-14T20:31:24+0100] • arthurzam: yes +[2024-04-14T20:31:26+0100] • ajak: yes +[2024-04-14T20:31:27+0100] <@ulm> is the "also has" part included in the motion? +[2024-04-14T20:31:31+0100] • soap: yes +[2024-04-14T20:31:59+0100] <@sam_> no, it's just relevant context, "obiter dicta" +[2024-04-14T20:32:06+0100] <@ulm> k +[2024-04-14T20:32:09+0100] • ulm: yes +[2024-04-14T20:32:12+0100] <+arthurzam> The motion is between """ and """" +[2024-04-14T20:32:41+0100] <@sam_> 6 yes which is everyone in attendance as dilfridge isn't here +[2024-04-14T20:32:48+0100] <@sam_> motion passes +[2024-04-14T20:33:09+0100] <@sam_> +[2024-04-14T20:33:10+0100] <@sam_> 5. Open bugs with Council participation [5] +[2024-04-14T20:33:11+0100] <+arthurzam> A stupid question, where do we put this motion? Into Code of Conduct? +[2024-04-14T20:33:25+0100] <@ajak> good question +[2024-04-14T20:33:28+0100] <@sam_> hm, a good question indeed +[2024-04-14T20:34:21+0100] <@ulm> CoC doesn't look right for this +[2024-04-14T20:34:38+0100] <@ajak> no, it's not exactly a living document IMO +[2024-04-14T20:34:41+0100] <@mgorny> it's not like we haven't put a lot of motions that didn't formally end up in any specific document +[2024-04-14T20:34:50+0100] <@ajak> maybe spray it into the github bot or so? +[2024-04-14T20:34:54+0100] <@sam_> right, but I would like to be able to reference it *somewhere* +[2024-04-14T20:35:05+0100] <@sam_> the github bot might be enough +[2024-04-14T20:35:05+0100] <@mgorny> subpage of Project:Council? +[2024-04-14T20:35:07+0100] <@sam_> yes +[2024-04-14T20:35:10+0100] <@ajak> no, but not everything is as important for random contributors +[2024-04-14T20:35:10+0100] <@ulm> council log isn't good enough? +[2024-04-14T20:35:14+0100] <@sam_> then link to it in Larry The Cow's message, perhaps +[2024-04-14T20:35:20+0100] <@sam_> good enough? +[2024-04-14T20:35:33+0100] <@ajak> council wiki page + linked from larry wfm +[2024-04-14T20:35:46+0100] <+arthurzam> good enough for me (ajak's) +[2024-04-14T20:35:47+0100] <@ulm> or make it a GLEP :p +[2024-04-14T20:35:55+0100] <@sam_> it had occurred to me but I didn't want to say it :p +[2024-04-14T20:36:06+0100] <@mgorny> let's have ChatGPT write a GLEP for us +[2024-04-14T20:36:09+0100] • mgorny: hides +[2024-04-14T20:36:27+0100] <+arthurzam> It is actually good at it, just so you know +[2024-04-14T20:36:43+0100] <@sam_> ok i think let's move on +[2024-04-14T20:36:44+0100] <@sam_> 5. Open bugs with Council participation [5] +[2024-04-14T20:36:44+0100] <@mgorny> kinda sounds like paradox +[2024-04-14T20:36:50+0100] <@sam_> [5] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council#Open_bugs_with_Council_participation +[2024-04-14T20:36:51+0100] <@mgorny> requesting a contribution that forbids AI contributions +[2024-04-14T20:36:56+0100] <@sam_> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&email2=council%40gentoo.org&emailassigned_to2=1&emailcc2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=substring&list_id=7126537&query_format=advanced +[2024-04-14T20:36:59+0100] <@sam_> we have: +[2024-04-14T20:37:05+0100] <@sam_> bug 925014 +[2024-04-14T20:37:06+0100] <willikins> sam_: https://bugs.gentoo.org/925014 "PR services lacking developer redundancy"; Community Relations, User Relations; CONF; ajak:pr +[2024-04-14T20:37:09+0100] <@sam_> already discussed +[2024-04-14T20:37:12+0100] <@sam_> bug 926867 +[2024-04-14T20:37:13+0100] <willikins> sam_: https://bugs.gentoo.org/926867 "Vote: Gentoo Linux accepts the invitation to become an SPI associated project [...]"; Gentoo Council, unspecified; IN_P; dilfridge:council +[2024-04-14T20:37:27+0100] <@sam_> all voting is done there & unanimous +[2024-04-14T20:37:30+0100] <@sam_> I think the bug can be closed? +[2024-04-14T20:37:37+0100] <@sam_> ditto bug 925736 +[2024-04-14T20:37:38+0100] <willikins> sam_: https://bugs.gentoo.org/925736 "Vote: Gentoo Linux applies to become an SPI associated project"; Gentoo Council, unspecified; IN_P; dilfridge:council +[2024-04-14T20:37:40+0100] • ajak: yes +[2024-04-14T20:37:51+0100] <+arthurzam> I think yes, we mentioned the vote results in logs, can close for paper trail +[2024-04-14T20:37:54+0100] <@sam_> yes +[2024-04-14T20:38:06+0100] <@sam_> now, there *is* a substantive thing left +[2024-04-14T20:38:20+0100] <@sam_> bug 929012 which we probably should've brought up earlier in item 2 :) +[2024-04-14T20:38:21+0100] <willikins> sam_: https://bugs.gentoo.org/929012 "Vote on GLEP 76 change: Shift responsibilities from Trustees to Council"; Documentation, GLEP Changes; CONF; ulm:glep +[2024-04-14T20:38:59+0100] <@ulm> it's all in the diff :) +[2024-04-14T20:39:03+0100] <+arthurzam> I think we can straight up jump to ulm's diff https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=890073&action=diff +[2024-04-14T20:39:08+0100] <@ulm> plus commit messages +[2024-04-14T20:39:14+0100] <@sam_> I think we can just leave that to voting on the bug +[2024-04-14T20:39:22+0100] <@sam_> it's very straightforward +[2024-04-14T20:39:25+0100] <@ajak> yeah, vote asynchronously as the others +[2024-04-14T20:39:29+0100] <@sam_> yes +[2024-04-14T20:39:30+0100] <@ulm> wfm +[2024-04-14T20:39:39+0100] <+arthurzam> mattst88 was supporting for the change +[2024-04-14T20:39:44+0100] <@sam_> ok +[2024-04-14T20:39:47+0100] <@sam_> 6. Open floor +[2024-04-14T20:39:50+0100] <@sam_> anyone got anything? +[2024-04-14T20:40:05+0100] <+arthurzam> me, give a moment to write it +[2024-04-14T20:40:56+0100] <+arthurzam> We have elections in ~2 month - should we start contact with elections team so the elections and all the windows are spaced enough (not repeat previous times where they were very short) +[2024-04-14T20:41:05+0100] <+arthurzam> so start contact + plan +[2024-04-14T20:41:20+0100] <@mgorny> sure +[2024-04-14T20:41:22+0100] <@ajak> ah good idea +[2024-04-14T20:41:29+0100] <@mgorny> let's ping eleections team +[2024-04-14T20:41:33+0100] <@sam_> !proj elections +[2024-04-14T20:41:34+0100] <willikins> sam_: (elections@gentoo.org) arthurzam, neddyseagoon, robbat2 +[2024-04-14T20:41:35+0100] <@sam_> ^^ +[2024-04-14T20:41:54+0100] <+arthurzam> Oh, didn't know I was there :) +[2024-04-14T20:42:36+0100] <+arthurzam> (and that was all from me for open floor) +[2024-04-14T20:42:45+0100] <@sam_> thanks! +[2024-04-14T20:42:56+0100] <@sam_> I think the ping is probably enough for now and no need for us to do anything else +[2024-04-14T20:43:05+0100] <+arthurzam> I agree +[2024-04-14T20:43:06+0100] <@ulm> plus trustees elections shortly after (for 3 of the 5 trustees I think) +[2024-04-14T20:43:09+0100] <@ajak> yeah, thus the ball rolls +[2024-04-14T20:43:22+0100] <@sam_> ulm: hopefully the last :) +[2024-04-14T20:43:32+0100] <@ulm> yes +[2024-04-14T20:43:35+0100] <+arthurzam> Oh, also missing logs for council march +[2024-04-14T20:43:37+0100] • ajak: counts how many times we've said that +[2024-04-14T20:43:47+0100] <+arthurzam> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Meeting_logs +[2024-04-14T20:43:47+0100] <@sam_> arthurzam: yes, I plan on doing them not long after this meeting +[2024-04-14T20:44:10+0100] <@sam_> I should do the logs immediately then do the summary later rather than batching +[2024-04-14T20:44:13+0100] <+NeddySeagoon> arthurzam: You added yourself as an official +[2024-04-14T20:44:14+0100] <@sam_> as logs > nothing +[2024-04-14T20:44:26+0100] <@sam_> anyway +[2024-04-14T20:44:28+0100] <@sam_> I think we're all done +[2024-04-14T20:44:29+0100] <@sam_> thanks all! +[2024-04-14T20:44:31+0100] • sam_: bangs gavel diff --git a/meeting-logs/20240414.txt.asc b/meeting-logs/20240414.txt.asc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..20f3151 --- /dev/null +++ b/meeting-logs/20240414.txt.asc @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iNUEABYKAH0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCZh4EC18UgAAAAAAuAChp +c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB +NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MAAKCRBzhAn1IN+R +kCQwAQDB0DMTWZNLih0CjgwRWOcCtiy9w0WKOEffaj62tsqO7wEA45zazGtKLorS +53OModh82COEj5jdx+bc/N6MW+mVKQA= +=dHmP +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |